Thursday, February 19, 2009

A Thousand Words



What does that say to you?

Is it a funny pun about rampaging chimpanzees and the ridiculous size and scope of President Obama's stimulus plan? The kind of joke that pokes funny at those always idiotic politicians we seem to send to Washington every year?

Or, does it say something darker. Does it seem to you that this cartoon is advocating that a "monkey" like President Obama should be shot for even attempting to pass something like the stimulus package. A reminder that this "monkey's" tenure as president has barely begun and already he's out of control and needs to be put down.

What do you see?

I'm sure most of y'all can guess what I saw in that picture. And, those of you who have discussed racism with folks in the general public can probably guess what the many commenters on blogs and websites across the country saw as well. Obviously, they were not the same.

On my sidebar, I have a famous quote from W.E.B. DuBois that talks about life as a black man in America; the masks we wear, the double consciousness we must possess. This photo reminds me of the existence of that double consciousness.

After all, without trying, I was able to understand both potential meanings of this cartoon. I instinctively knew how the New York Post would respond to any criticism of the commentary and I knew how the general public would react and what their explanation would be. A chimp had just gone crazy the day before, bitten off a woman's hands and been shot by the police. Obviously there was obviously a valid reason for connecting chimps and police shooting.

My ability to predict the future wasn't some mystical gift. It's not that I'm blessed with an incredible amount of foresight, it's just that discussions of race have become so mired in a morass of recriminations and denials that it's hard NOT to predict the future.

I knew how many white people would react to this picture because it's in my best interest to know that information. Conversely, many white people seem shocked that a black person would have a problem with this picture because it's not in their best interest to have that kind of double consciousness.

Honestly, what benefit is there for most white people in knowing what offends or bothers black people? What benefit is there for people of any race? It probably won't you get a job or buy a home, it won't make you money, and it'll probably just make your life more difficult. If you worry about what black people find offensive, then you have to change your jokes, have uncomfortable conversations with family and friends, and generally interrupt your very settled and comfortable life. Who wants to do that?

It's much easier to say, as one commenter on TMZ put it: "Only a person who can't see past race would see this photo as racist." That neatly shifts the blame for being offended to those kooky people who go out of their way to find reasons for offense. So smooth. That way, you can feel superior and brave. You're telling an inconvenient truth and black folks and their sympathizers need to understand how the real world works. Lovely.

Truthfully, there are some legitimate questions to be asked about the response to this pic. After all, President Bush was compared to a monkey and black people didn't think that was racism. Here's a refresher, if you don't remember:



Only, from where I'm sitting, none of those pictures involve the former president getting shot. I mean, he looks funny, but he's not dead after being shot by the police. Just an observation. And, while the actual chimp was killed, that was only after he attacked an officer inside a patrol car. Originally, he was led away alive and in shackles.

See, that makes all the difference in my mind. It's not about me searching for a reason to be offended, it's about me having an understanding of the subtle messages society feeds us about the lives of black people and how to handle black people when they get out of line. Furthermore, my feeble mind is struggling to see how the shooting death of a rabid chimp relates to those people who worked on the stimulus.

Are they being compared to rabid chimps? If so, why? What about their actions shows that they are engaging in uncontrolled violence? There are far easier ways to make the point that the individuals who constructed the stimulus package and championed it were bumbling apes. I don't quite understand how comparing them to a violent monkey that was eventually shoot serves that purpose. A friend of mine posited that it might be an allusion to an old mathematical theorem about a chimp pecking away at a typewriter. But, that seemed a little too abstract for the Post.

Being attuned and informed about historical and current events makes it impossible for me to look at that cartoon and not see the connection between President Obama and a dead monkey. That would be like me seeing a picture of Lil' Kim today, and not being reminded of the damage European beauty standards do to black women everyday.

Unfortunately, that picture doesn't speak to everyone the same way, and neither do most things in the world. It's unlikely that we'll ever reach a consensus on subtle racial matters.

The monkey business will continue.




Share

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I always try to tell white people and black people alike that racism isn't going anywhere, unfortunately. I always hearken back to the war in Israel that has been going on for longer than any of our grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents grandparents were alive.

Anonymous said...

Damn... they got curious george.

All said and done... there will be racism for reasons the avg person cannot understand. God's law make it HARD for us to all get along... there are different nations for that very reason.

Big Man said...

I don't what the future holds in regards to racism, but as long as folks keep being racism deniers, things are going to be rough.

ch555x said...

There are several ways you can look at this, though the so-called cartoonist could have picked other dialogue to state his case. I never really bought into the whole "monkey" analogy concerning specific racial groups, though it gets irratating recalling it every once in a while when it gets brought up.

Then again, this is the NYPost. You can do a search on their countless covers or even search the cartoonist's past work and see it's a waste of time and energy understanding their take on certain issues.

Anonymous said...

um...

let us remember, the chimp was shot for mauling a white woman...

Anonymous said...

And, to add to the uppity negro's point about the "real" chimp, I think the take-away message the cartoonist want people to get is that Obama is dangerous to our wives and daughters and grandmothers because he's going to ruin their lives with this stimulus package.

Because, ya know, our grandmothers and such are all REALLY worried that we'll have fewer rich people in the country. They're not worried if they and their families have jobs, or if another bridge will collapse in a city and kill one of their loved ones...nah, they're at risk from the evil, rabid, destructive Barack Obama.

Shit, even if you go with the "benign" interpretation that Obama and gang are stupider than chimps for creating this package, that still falls flat, as Obama on his stupidest day is still godlike compared to Dubya's intellect.

The Original Wombman said...

It's interesting that you note double consciousness because for me, that was certainly at play here. I "got" the cartoon in many different ways.

I'm anxious to see what President Obama's reaction will be. I could see a condoning and even and encouragement of Obama's assassination in this "cartoon". What did Obama see? I'm not necessarily inclined to get up in arms in defense of someone if they are not up in arms in defense of themselves.

The New York Post has always been a problematic paper and I hope that now folks will refuse to buy it even if the price of a copy goes down to 2 cents. The only thing these folks understand is a hit to their wallet. Not protests and calls for boycotts but actual loss in revenue.

Anonymous said...

The new York Post has been the worst daily rag in America for a long time.

having grown up in new York, I swear that I am not surprised... and that this will likely not affect their circulation... and I hope that I am so wrong on that second count...

as always, thoughtful post BM




Raving Black Lunatic